Triple

T14700064
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bonhomme Richard E345270 entity
Predicate victoryClaim P6374 FINISHED
Object captured HMS Serapis despite being heavily damaged LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: captured HMS Serapis despite being heavily damaged | Statement: [Bonhomme Richard, victoryClaim, captured HMS Serapis despite being heavily damaged]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: victoryClaim
Context triple: [Bonhomme Richard, victoryClaim, captured HMS Serapis despite being heavily damaged]
  • A. victoryIn
    Indicates that one entity achieves a win or success in a specific contest, event, or competitive context involving another entity.
  • B. victoryTarget
    Indicates that one entity is the intended opponent, objective, or condition that must be overcome or achieved for the other entity to attain victory.
  • C. typeOfVictory chosen
    Indicates the specific manner or category in which a victory was achieved.
  • D. victoryLocation
    Indicates the place or setting where a victory or triumph occurs.
  • E. challengesClaim
    Indicates that one entity disputes, questions, or opposes the validity or correctness of another entity’s claim.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d822e4a8c08190a155df736bb7bc13 completed April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69deb605f5948190ab6b20887c4b6833 completed April 14, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de657c57ec8190ae0b9bb79a514566 completed April 14, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:28 a.m.