Triple
T1467162
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gallicanism |
E27050
|
entity |
| Predicate | challengedByDoctrine |
P5486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | papal infallibility |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: papal infallibility | Statement: [Gallicanism, challengedByDoctrine, papal infallibility]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedByDoctrine Context triple: [Gallicanism, challengedByDoctrine, papal infallibility]
-
A.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
B.
deniesDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
-
C.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
D.
followsDoctrine
Indicates that one entity adheres to, complies with, or acts in accordance with a specified doctrine or set of guiding principles.
-
E.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a496d25d6881909dbd84f86d763992 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5bcfa0881909d6137c69825bc7a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c48121e48190946c23c583e5fb64 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8:01 p.m.