Triple

T1464335
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jaqaru E31584 entity
Predicate hasSpeakerNumberTrend P5318 FINISHED
Object declining LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: declining | Statement: [Jaqaru, hasSpeakerNumberTrend, declining]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpeakerNumberTrend
Context triple: [Jaqaru, hasSpeakerNumberTrend, declining]
  • A. hasApproximateTotalSpeakers
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an estimated or roughly calculated number of total speakers, rather than an exact count.
  • B. hasSpeakerType
    Indicates that an entity functions in a particular role or category as a speaker (e.g., narrator, character, announcer) within a given context.
  • C. hasTrend chosen
    Indicates that something exhibits or is associated with a particular pattern of change or direction over time.
  • D. hasSpeakersIn
    Indicates that an entity (such as an event, conference, or session) includes or is associated with speakers located in or belonging to a specified place or group.
  • E. hasMainSpeaker
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or principal speaker associated with another entity, such as an event, recording, or presentation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49917dfc081909acdbdf5d684f1ef completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5ba2d5c81909ee85713de961fcb completed March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c48121e48190946c23c583e5fb64 completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.