Triple
T1463252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Poincaré group |
E31560
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDiscreteSymmetryExtension |
P28833
|
FINISHED |
| Object | parity transformation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parity transformation | Statement: [Poincaré group, hasDiscreteSymmetryExtension, parity transformation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDiscreteSymmetryExtension Context triple: [Poincaré group, hasDiscreteSymmetryExtension, parity transformation]
-
A.
usesSymmetryGroup
Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
-
B.
isMaximallySymmetric
Indicates that the subject exhibits the highest possible degree of symmetry allowed by the relevant structure, constraints, or context.
-
C.
hasIsometryGroup
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular isometry group describing all distance-preserving transformations of that entity.
-
D.
isSymmetric
Indicates that a relationship holds in both directions between two entities, so if it applies from A to B, it also applies from B to A.
-
E.
canHavePairingSymmetry
Indicates that an entity is capable of exhibiting or supporting a specific type of pairing symmetry in its interactions or internal structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49917dfc081909acdbdf5d684f1ef |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c5b89708819084fb9ba4ff293b8b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c48121e48190946c23c583e5fb64 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4c55508948190922aee3230a4323e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.