Triple
T145857
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CharlieCard |
E3327
|
entity |
| Predicate | reusability |
P5431
|
FINISHED |
| Object | can be reloaded multiple times |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: can be reloaded multiple times | Statement: [CharlieCard, reusability, can be reloaded multiple times]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reusability Context triple: [CharlieCard, reusability, can be reloaded multiple times]
-
A.
usedFor
Indicates that one entity serves a purpose, function, or role in accomplishing, enabling, or supporting another entity or activity.
-
B.
usedWith
Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
-
C.
restriction
Indicates a limiting condition or rule that constrains or controls what an entity can do, use, or access in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
requires
Indicates that one entity must exist, occur, or be satisfied before another entity can exist, occur, or be carried out.
-
E.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a252868de4819080e21c9938bfe8b6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a257ea7eac8190884a53453a9e0dd6 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25656a4fc81908a87678ac3d28f93 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a257101060819094db0f3a3a72f312 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.