Triple
T14514306
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Core Yuman |
E340477
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yuman language subgroup |
C34883
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Yuman language subgroup Context triple: [Core Yuman, instanceOf, Yuman language subgroup]
-
A.
Munda languages subgroup
The Munda languages subgroup is a branch of the Austroasiatic language family spoken primarily in eastern and central India, characterized by agglutinative morphology and distinctive phonological and syntactic features.
-
B.
Penutian languages subgroup
The Penutian languages subgroup is a proposed family of Native American languages, primarily spoken in western North America, that are hypothesized to share a common ancestral origin based on structural and lexical similarities.
-
C.
subfamily of Tupian languages
A subfamily of Tupian languages is a smaller, genetically related group of languages within the larger Tupian family that share a more recent common ancestor and distinctive linguistic features.
-
D.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
-
E.
Oto-Manguean language
An Oto-Manguean language is a member of a large, diverse family of indigenous Mesoamerican languages, primarily spoken in Mexico, characterized by complex tonal systems and significant grammatical and phonological variation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d822d9c0408190b9a2b3643e58bb4d |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:21 a.m.