Triple

T1450556
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Itzamna E31279 entity
Predicate mythologicalFunction P9987 FINISHED
Object inventor of writing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inventor of writing | Statement: [Itzamna, mythologicalFunction, inventor of writing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mythologicalFunction
Context triple: [Itzamna, mythologicalFunction, inventor of writing]
  • A. mythologicalRole chosen
    Indicates the specific function, duty, or status an entity holds within a mythological or legendary context.
  • B. mythologicalEvent
    Indicates an event or occurrence that takes place within mythological narratives or traditions, often involving gods, heroes, or supernatural phenomena.
  • C. mythologicalGeneration
    Indicates a generational relationship in mythology, where one mythological being or group descends from or follows another in a lineage or succession.
  • D. linkedToMythology
    Indicates that something has a connection or association with a mythological tradition, figure, story, or theme.
  • E. languageOfMyths
    Indicates that the subject is the language in which the myths associated with the object are told or recorded.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a499171a28819085b993a3ac78e363 completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c55d923c8190957756f834f94462 completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c47cdbd0819092022344a2f4ad7b completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.