Triple

T14469302
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Eastern Mansi E358794 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Southern Mansi E363565 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern Mansi | Statement: [Eastern Mansi, relatedTo, Southern Mansi]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Southern Mansi
Context triple: [Eastern Mansi, relatedTo, Southern Mansi]
  • A. Southern Mansi chosen
    Southern Mansi is a dialect of the Uralic Mansi language traditionally spoken by the Mansi people in parts of western Siberia.
  • B. Eastern Mansi
    Eastern Mansi is a dialect of the Uralic Mansi language traditionally spoken by Mansi communities in the eastern part of their historical territory in western Siberia.
  • C. Northern Mansi
    Northern Mansi is a primary dialect of the Uralic Mansi language spoken by the Mansi people in northern Russia.
  • D. Western Mansi
    Western Mansi is a dialect of the Mansi (Vogul) language spoken by the Mansi people in western Siberia.
  • E. Southern Khanty
    Southern Khanty is a dialectal variety of the Uralic Khanty language traditionally spoken by Khanty communities in the southern part of their historical territory in western Siberia.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d827966698819082e140837737501d completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de91f969788190a5114f92d7159aae completed April 14, 2026, 7:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fdd5c018788190afad213c580d7072 completed May 8, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:20 a.m.