Triple

T14444655
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject S.W.2d E358170 entity
Predicate hasAbbreviation P43 FINISHED
Object S.W.2d E358170 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: S.W.2d | Statement: [S.W.2d, hasAbbreviation, S.W.2d]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: S.W.2d
Context triple: [S.W.2d, hasAbbreviation, S.W.2d]
  • A. S.W.2d chosen
    S.W.2d is the standard legal citation abbreviation for the second series of the South Western Reporter, a regional case law reporter covering appellate decisions from several U.S. states.
  • B. S.W.3d
    S.W.3d is the standard legal citation abbreviation for the third series of the South Western Reporter, a regional case law reporter covering appellate decisions from several U.S. states.
  • C. Sossamon v. Texas
    Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
  • D. Alabama v. Texas
    Alabama v. Texas is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed a dispute among states over offshore submerged lands and the scope of federal authority under the Constitution.
  • E. Zurawski v. State of Texas
    Zurawski v. State of Texas is a high-profile lawsuit in which women denied medically necessary abortions challenge the state’s near-total abortion ban as unconstitutional and dangerously restrictive to pregnant patients’ health.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d82794dfa081909b9134ad2e32244b completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de915e76f481909fe9462f964b5b1c completed April 14, 2026, 7:11 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fd5bdd0f388190870ddd01f66d3e99 completed May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:19 a.m.