Triple

T14439842
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Velocity templates E358056 entity
Predicate contextContains P95472 FINISHED
Object Java objects LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Java objects | Statement: [Velocity templates, contextContains, Java objects]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contextContains
Context triple: [Velocity templates, contextContains, Java objects]
  • A. contextHolds
    Indicates that a particular contextual condition or situation is valid and in effect for the related entities or statements.
  • B. typicallyContain chosen
    Indicates that one entity is normally or commonly found within, included in, or held by another entity under usual circumstances.
  • C. contextOf
    Indicates that one entity provides the situational, informational, or environmental background within which another entity exists, occurs, or is interpreted.
  • D. context
    Indicates that one entity provides the surrounding circumstances, setting, or background within which another entity, event, or statement occurs or is interpreted.
  • E. containedWith
    Indicates that one entity is located or kept inside the bounds or interior space of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8279402a88190821ffa39ae15bccf completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de914c1398819090fa2a74d257ba3e completed April 14, 2026, 7:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69de5c3a02fc819097373f97a260cdeb completed April 14, 2026, 3:24 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:18 a.m.