Triple
T14413019
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Riihimäki |
E357378
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kanta-Häme |
E220011
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kanta-Häme | Statement: [Riihimäki, locatedIn, Kanta-Häme]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kanta-Häme Context triple: [Riihimäki, locatedIn, Kanta-Häme]
-
A.
Kanta-Häme
chosen
Kanta-Häme is a region in southern Finland known for its historic towns, lakes, and forests, with Hämeenlinna as its central city.
-
B.
Kymenlaakso
Kymenlaakso is a region in southeastern Finland known for its industrial centers, coastal location along the Gulf of Finland, and historically significant role as a settlement area for evacuees from Karelia.
-
C.
Kainuu region
Kainuu region is an eastern Finnish region known for its vast forests, numerous lakes, and sparsely populated rural landscapes.
-
D.
Pirkanmaa region
Pirkanmaa region is a province in southern Finland centered around the city of Tampere, known for its lakes, industry, and cultural significance.
-
E.
Päijät-Häme
Päijät-Häme is a region in southern Finland known for its lakes, forests, and the city of Lahti as its main urban center.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d82793421c8190861eb0e673b085de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de90cb3c708190822f5506ebf7ee9d |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff3d379bc881908b7954c633787165 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:17 a.m.