Triple
T14412307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Encarna (Blancanieves) |
E357358
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToAntonioVillalta |
P114153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | second wife |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: second wife | Statement: [Encarna (Blancanieves), relationshipToAntonioVillalta, second wife]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToAntonioVillalta Context triple: [Encarna (Blancanieves), relationshipToAntonioVillalta, second wife]
-
A.
relationshipToMiguel
Indicates the nature or type of relationship that one entity has with Miguel.
-
B.
relationToDominicanFamily
Indicates a familial or kinship relationship that a person has with a Dominican family.
-
C.
relationshipToPilarBardem
Indicates the specific familial, professional, or social relationship that an entity has to Pilar Bardem.
-
D.
relationshipToTinaBordereau
Indicates the specific type of personal or professional relationship an entity has with Tina Bordereau.
-
E.
relationshipToLoretta Castorini
Indicates the specific familial, romantic, or social connection that an entity has to Loretta Castorini.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d82793421c8190861eb0e673b085de |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de90cb3c708190822f5506ebf7ee9d |
completed | April 14, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2aa1b57881909a033eac8545c417 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:53 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69de2e08b6c08190bb4c929deab236a6 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:17 a.m.