Triple

T1440575
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bostock v. Clayton County E31059 entity
Predicate consolidatedWith P7838 FINISHED
Object Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda E165284 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda | Statement: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedWith, Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Context triple: [Bostock v. Clayton County, consolidatedWith, Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda]
  • A. Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda chosen
    Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal employment discrimination law protects gay and lesbian employees from being fired because of their sexual orientation.
  • B. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
  • C. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether federal employment discrimination law protects transgender employees from being fired because of their gender identity.
  • D. EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
    EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that held employers may not refuse to hire applicants to avoid accommodating their religious practices, even if the need for accommodation is not explicitly stated.
  • E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4991633388190a4d61b5a98aa407a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5307e988190b392f1f1d1ac10f0 completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad0e6e12748190baeb91ba843a716f completed March 8, 2026, 5:51 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.