Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. | Statement: [Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, precedentFor, Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.]

Target entity: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
Context triple: [Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, precedentFor, Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.]

• A. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
  Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. is a landmark 1928 New York Court of Appeals case, authored by Judge Benjamin Cardozo, that established the modern American doctrine of proximate cause and foreseeability in negligence law.
• B. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
• C. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• D. Hines v. Davidowitz
  Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
• E. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
  Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
Triple: [Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, precedentFor, Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.]

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for hostile work environment sexual harassment under Title VII by holding that conduct can be actionable even without proof of severe psychological injury.

Target entity: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
Target entity description: Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for hostile work environment sexual harassment under Title VII by holding that conduct can be actionable even without proof of severe psychological injury.

• A. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
  Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. is a landmark 1928 New York Court of Appeals case, authored by Judge Benjamin Cardozo, that established the modern American doctrine of proximate cause and foreseeability in negligence law.
• B. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
• C. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• D. Hines v. Davidowitz
  Hines v. Davidowitz is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws under the Supremacy Clause.
• E. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
  Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
• F. None of above. chosen