Triple
T143647
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clackamas County, Oregon |
E2905
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAreaType |
P6822
|
FINISHED |
| Object | land and water |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: land and water | Statement: [Clackamas County, Oregon, hasAreaType, land and water]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAreaType Context triple: [Clackamas County, Oregon, hasAreaType, land and water]
-
A.
hasProtectedArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a designated protected area for conservation or restricted use.
-
B.
hasAreaCode
Indicates that a specified telephone area code is assigned to or associated with a particular geographic region, location, or phone service entity.
-
C.
hasCatchmentArea
Indicates that a geographic or administrative unit serves as the area from which an entity (such as a facility or service) draws its users, resources, or influence.
-
D.
area
Indicates that one entity has a measured two-dimensional extent or surface size quantified by another entity.
-
E.
hasProtectedAreaStatus
Indicates that an area is officially designated and managed as a protected area under relevant conservation or legal frameworks.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2521e35c08190b28e5c9f1e3c9b59 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2580ca15481909fa3e87d804a1b23 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2565559ac81909e0c4e095a7dfa27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2580b00988190868ee24c0289cf70 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.