Triple
T14311404
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Enschede |
E354840
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNeighbouringMunicipality |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Haaksbergen |
E261296
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Haaksbergen | Statement: [Enschede, hasNeighbouringMunicipality, Haaksbergen]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Haaksbergen Context triple: [Enschede, hasNeighbouringMunicipality, Haaksbergen]
-
A.
Haaksbergen
chosen
Haaksbergen is a town in the eastern Netherlands, near the German border, known for its rural surroundings and cross-border ties with neighboring German communities.
-
B.
Hansweert
Hansweert is a small village in the Dutch province of Zeeland, known historically as a canal and shipping hub along the Western Scheldt.
-
C.
Bergeijk
Bergeijk is a municipality and village in the southern Netherlands, located in the province of North Brabant near the Belgian border.
-
D.
Grijpskerke
Grijpskerke is a village in the Dutch province of Zeeland, located on the former island of Walcheren.
-
E.
Groesbeek
Groesbeek is a village in the Dutch province of Gelderland, known for its hilly landscape, World War II history, and wine production.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278ed42c8190b9f882dcce611347 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de85b386d0819087d14f3ce84a1997 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69feb7cccd548190b9ec93f9d9d2f2af |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:12 a.m.