Triple
T14262889
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ukraine (as third party in other disputes citing DS512) |
E353568
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesPrecedent |
P8827
|
FINISHED |
| Object | panel reasoning in DS512 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: panel reasoning in DS512 | Statement: [Ukraine (as third party in other disputes citing DS512), usesPrecedent, panel reasoning in DS512]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPrecedent Context triple: [Ukraine (as third party in other disputes citing DS512), usesPrecedent, panel reasoning in DS512]
-
A.
precedentFor
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
-
B.
typicalPrecedent
Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
-
C.
modifiedPrecedent
Indicates that one entity has altered, qualified, or changed the terms, scope, or interpretation of a prior decision, rule, or precedent.
-
D.
precedentInterpreted
chosen
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
E.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de63563fc88190b0abdbf8529c65eb |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69de2a7d586c8190846ff242bbf5ac53 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:09 a.m.