Triple
T14249658
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edina |
E353222
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorRoad |
P385
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Interstate 494 |
E195846
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Interstate 494 | Statement: [Edina, hasMajorRoad, Interstate 494]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Interstate 494 Context triple: [Edina, hasMajorRoad, Interstate 494]
-
A.
Interstate 494
chosen
Interstate 494 is a major beltway highway forming part of the loop around the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area in Minnesota.
-
B.
Interstate 294
Interstate 294 is a major toll highway in the Chicago metropolitan area that forms part of the Tri-State Tollway, carrying traffic around the city and connecting key regional routes.
-
C.
I-290
I-290 is a major Interstate Highway in northeastern Illinois that serves as a key commuter route connecting Chicago with its western suburbs.
-
D.
Interstate 290
Interstate 290 is a highway in western New York that serves as a key connector between Buffalo’s suburbs and major regional routes.
-
E.
Interstate 290
Interstate 290 is a highway in Massachusetts that serves as a key connector between Worcester and the surrounding regional interstate network.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8278c43e08190824146f4632b89a5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de6295ef9081909cfb0c1283bca21a |
completed | April 14, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff218b93d48190a7e16c3934828aa8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:08 a.m.