Triple

T1424211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commonwealth High Commissioners E30291 entity
Predicate usesPremisesCalled P28949 FINISHED
Object high commission LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high commission | Statement: [Commonwealth High Commissioners, usesPremisesCalled, high commission]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPremisesCalled
Context triple: [Commonwealth High Commissioners, usesPremisesCalled, high commission]
  • A. usedCourt
    Indicates that an entity made use of or participated in legal proceedings within a particular court.
  • B. premise
    Indicates that a statement or proposition provides the foundational assumption or starting point from which a conclusion or inference is logically derived.
  • C. usedInCourts
    Indicates that something is employed or applied within legal court settings, such as in judicial proceedings or courtroom processes.
  • D. isUsedUnder
    Indicates that one entity is utilized or applied within the context, conditions, or framework defined by another entity.
  • E. accusedIn
    Indicates that a person or entity is formally charged with wrongdoing in a particular case, proceeding, or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498fb823c8190a67ce4c4837e641a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c52e4ed881908d85e0cb9fe851ac completed March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c4752abc8190a33b634c4d6fad28 completed March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c52bbb748190aaa804438d31f4c2 completed March 1, 2026, 11 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.