Triple
T1422923
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Intel Iris Xe |
E30263
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsCodec |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | H.264 decode |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: H.264 decode | Statement: [Intel Iris Xe, supportsCodec, H.264 decode]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsCodec Context triple: [Intel Iris Xe, supportsCodec, H.264 decode]
-
A.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
B.
supportsType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or being compatible with a specified type.
-
C.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
-
D.
hasSupported
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
-
E.
supportsTargetType
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, handling, or being compatible with a specified target type.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498fb823c8190a67ce4c4837e641a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c52e4ed881908d85e0cb9fe851ac |
completed | March 1, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4c4752abc8190a33b634c4d6fad28 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.