Triple

T14148274
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Árpád E350608 entity
Predicate nameInHungarian P27628 FINISHED
Object Árpád E350608 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Árpád | Statement: [Árpád, nameInHungarian, Árpád]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Árpád
Context triple: [Árpád, nameInHungarian, Árpád]
  • A. Árpád chosen
    Árpád was the 9th-century chieftain who led the Hungarian tribes into the Carpathian Basin and is traditionally regarded as the founder of the Hungarian state.
  • B. Arpad
    Arpad was an important ancient city-state in northern Syria that served as a major political and military center in the first millennium BCE.
  • C. Géza I of Hungary
    Géza I of Hungary was an 11th-century king of Hungary known for his role in consolidating royal power and navigating internal dynastic conflicts.
  • D. Béla I of Hungary
    Béla I of Hungary was an 11th-century King of Hungary known for consolidating royal power and playing a key role in the kingdom’s early medieval development.
  • E. Géza, Grand Prince of the Hungarians
    Géza, Grand Prince of the Hungarians, was the late 10th-century ruler who consolidated Hungarian power in the Carpathian Basin and initiated the kingdom’s gradual Christianization.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d827865f608190b311820428ae027b completed April 9, 2026, 10:26 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de61237ef481909374c1f68a2370b7 completed April 14, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69fcdf205c788190920b5055f9fe63a8 completed May 7, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 12:55 a.m.