Triple

T140228
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nevada E2834 entity
Predicate hasCounty P285 FINISHED
Object Storey County E26455 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Storey County | Statement: [Nevada, hasCounty, Storey County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Storey County
Context triple: [Nevada, hasCounty, Storey County]
  • A. Storey County chosen
    Storey County is a small, historic county in northern Nevada best known for the Comstock Lode mining district and the preserved 19th-century town of Virginia City.
  • B. LaRue County
    LaRue County is a rural county in central Kentucky best known as the birthplace region of Abraham Lincoln, with Hodgenville as its county seat.
  • C. Lawrence County
    Lawrence County is a county in western Pennsylvania that forms part of the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan region.
  • D. Butler County
    Butler County is a county in western Pennsylvania, north of Pittsburgh, known for its mix of suburban communities, rural landscapes, and growing industrial and service sectors.
  • E. Lyon County
    Lyon County is a largely rural county in western Nevada known for its historic mining towns and growing residential communities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2521e35c08190b28e5c9f1e3c9b59 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a257c679d88190bc71775dab2cfc64 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a36473a3d88190b20052b2c0d272a2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.