Triple
T13969550
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neil Page |
E336017
|
entity |
| Predicate | humorStyleAssociated |
P14479
|
FINISHED |
| Object | situational comedy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: situational comedy | Statement: [Neil Page, humorStyleAssociated, situational comedy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: humorStyleAssociated Context triple: [Neil Page, humorStyleAssociated, situational comedy]
-
A.
hasHumorType
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular style, category, or type of humor.
-
B.
humorSetting
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies or controls the level, style, or presence of humor applied to another entity or context.
-
C.
hasHumorousTreatmentOf
Indicates that one entity presents or portrays another entity in a humorous, comedic, or joking manner.
-
D.
isHumorousCharacter
Indicates that the character is portrayed in a humorous way or primarily serves a comedic role in the context.
-
E.
relatedStyle
Indicates that one style is associated with, similar to, or derived from another style in some relevant way.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c61f3508190aaf2ca0dc0002c59 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de2e8daeac8190aadd4b3b60222482 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dd465a21408190b912a42c50ffa0d9 |
completed | April 13, 2026, 7:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:18 p.m.