Triple

T139332
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constitution of California E2816 entity
Predicate previousVersionAdopted P5977 FINISHED
Object 1849 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1849 | Statement: [Constitution of California, previousVersionAdopted, 1849]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousVersionAdopted
Context triple: [Constitution of California, previousVersionAdopted, 1849]
  • A. backwardCompatibleWith
    Indicates that one entity can correctly interpret, use, or function with data, interfaces, or behavior designed for an earlier version of another entity.
  • B. backwardCompatibility
    Indicates that one entity remains functional or compatible when used with an earlier version or older form of another entity.
  • C. historicallyImplementedAs
    Indicates that one entity was used or realized as another entity in the past, even if that is no longer the case.
  • D. wasSupersededBy
    Indicates that one entity has been replaced or made obsolete by another entity that takes over its role or function.
  • E. adoptedBy
    Indicates that an entity has been taken in and legally or formally accepted as a child, member, or responsibility by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2521e35c08190b28e5c9f1e3c9b59 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a257c679d88190bc71775dab2cfc64 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2565426c08190aab68e34a6a2d60e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25737f9188190b9690dce98aed83a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:31 a.m.