Triple
T1390459
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lady of the Thistle |
E29942
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInsigniaOfOrder |
P1617
|
FINISHED |
| Object | green riband |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: green riband | Statement: [Lady of the Thistle, hasInsigniaOfOrder, green riband]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInsigniaOfOrder Context triple: [Lady of the Thistle, hasInsigniaOfOrder, green riband]
-
A.
hasInsigniaWornBy
Indicates that a particular insignia is worn by a specified entity (such as a person, group, or organization).
-
B.
isOrderOfKnighthood
Indicates that an entity is a formal chivalric or knightly order to which individuals can be admitted.
-
C.
hasTypeOfInsignia
chosen
Indicates that an entity bears or is associated with a specific kind or category of insignia.
-
D.
hasHeraldicFamily
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular heraldic family or lineage, typically sharing the same coat of arms or heraldic identity.
-
E.
protectiveEmblemName
Indicates that a given name is the designated title or label of a protective emblem associated with an entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498dc92f8819094a1108f8ac90f43 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c35e023c8190b45688796d90534b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4beffcf808190ab4cd0271257ce63 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.