Triple
T13846421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hron River |
E332816
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRightTributary |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nitra River |
E492393
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nitra River | Statement: [Hron River, hasRightTributary, Nitra River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nitra River Context triple: [Hron River, hasRightTributary, Nitra River]
-
A.
Nitra River
chosen
The Nitra River is a significant river in western Slovakia that flows through several towns and agricultural regions before joining the Váh River.
-
B.
Žitava River
The Žitava River is a river in southern Slovakia that flows through the Danubian Lowland before joining the Nitra River.
-
C.
Opava River
The Opava River is a significant watercourse in the Czech Republic that flows through the historical region of Silesia, including the city of Opava, before joining the Oder River.
-
D.
Bystrica River
The Bystrica River is a Slovak river that flows through central Slovakia and joins the Hron River as one of its notable tributaries.
-
E.
Brda River
The Brda River is a significant river in northern Poland that flows through the city of Bydgoszcz and is known for its scenic landscapes and recreational opportunities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c5ba13c8190839315f54768acfd |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de02b1a25c8190a9f85ba43c421188 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fe6b38823881909c9df93371782b47 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.