Triple

T13826769
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Honey Creek, Iowa E332269 entity
Predicate hasName P744 FINISHED
Object Honey Creek NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Honey Creek | Statement: [Honey Creek, Iowa, hasName, Honey Creek]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Honey Creek
Context triple: [Honey Creek, Iowa, hasName, Honey Creek]
  • A. Honey Creek chosen
    Honey Creek is a small unincorporated community in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, known primarily for its rural setting and proximity to the Missouri River.
  • B. Hunting Creek
    Hunting Creek is a smaller stream in North Carolina that feeds into the Yadkin River as one of its tributaries.
  • C. Well Creek
    Well Creek is a waterway associated with the locality of Upwell in England, forming part of the region’s drainage and navigation network.
  • D. Schell Creek
    Schell Creek is a stream in eastern Nevada that flows through the Schell Creek Range and contributes to the region’s high-desert watershed.
  • E. Rush Creek
    Rush Creek is a significant Sierra Nevada stream in California that flows into Mono Lake and supports important riparian and aquatic ecosystems.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d81c5ae7c88190b0dd41bdafeb5999 completed April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de0295d2d48190b08eba0d805bd72d completed April 14, 2026, 9:02 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:13 p.m.