Triple

T1382227
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gauss's law E29363 entity
Predicate constantIn P9782 FINISHED
Object vacuum permittivity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vacuum permittivity | Statement: [Gauss's law, constantIn, vacuum permittivity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constantIn
Context triple: [Gauss's law, constantIn, vacuum permittivity]
  • A. constant
    Indicates that the relationship or value does not change across different instances, contexts, or over time.
  • B. usesConstant
    Indicates that one entity makes use of a specific constant value defined or provided by another entity.
  • C. relatedConstant
    Indicates that one entity is a fixed, unchanging value or constant that is associated with or linked to another entity.
  • D. includesConstant chosen
    Indicates that one entity contains or explicitly references a specific constant value within its definition or structure.
  • E. structureConstants
    Indicates that the given values are the structure constants specifying how basis elements of an algebra (or Lie algebra) multiply or bracket to produce linear combinations of other basis elements.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498d883a48190bfdca525296ef7ee completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c3361bf08190b3f6bbf82e17685b completed March 1, 2026, 10:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4befe343c81909f758440a531b5be completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.