Triple
T1381111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SPX |
E29338
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasContractStyle |
P27161
|
FINISHED |
| Object | European-style options |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European-style options | Statement: [SPX, hasContractStyle, European-style options]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContractStyle Context triple: [SPX, hasContractStyle, European-style options]
-
A.
hasStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
B.
hasSignatureVisualStyle
Indicates that an entity is characterized by a distinctive and recognizable visual style that sets it apart from others.
-
C.
hasExclusiveContractFor
Indicates that one party holds sole contractual rights to provide, use, or represent a specific product, service, or opportunity, excluding all other potential counterparties.
-
D.
hasStyleGuide
Indicates that one entity is associated with or governed by a particular style guide that defines its formatting or presentation conventions.
-
E.
hasSubstyle
Indicates that one style is a more specific or subordinate variant of another style within a hierarchical style structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498d883a48190bfdca525296ef7ee |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c31b176c8190a896183140c5c8be |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4befe343c81909f758440a531b5be |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4c0335f7081908d50046ced4cdee0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:39 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:59 p.m.