Triple
T13764641
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elbląg |
E330705
|
entity |
| Predicate | twinCity |
P1072
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nowy Sącz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nowy Sącz | Statement: [Elbląg, twinCity, Nowy Sącz]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nowy Sącz Context triple: [Elbląg, twinCity, Nowy Sącz]
-
A.
Nowy Sącz
chosen
Nowy Sącz is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, cultural heritage, and role as a local economic and administrative center.
-
B.
Stary Sącz
Stary Sącz is a historic town in southern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval urban layout and cultural heritage.
-
C.
Sianów
Sianów is a small town in northwestern Poland known for its historical ties to the Pomerania region and its location near the Baltic coast.
-
D.
Szczekociny
Szczekociny is a small historic town in southern Poland, known for its location in the Silesian Voivodeship and the nearby site of the 1794 Battle of Szczekociny.
-
E.
Szczecinek
Szczecinek is a town in northwestern Poland known for its lakeside setting, historic architecture, and role as a local economic and cultural center in the West Pomeranian Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c583b0081909e408a17db517a21 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de022690ac8190bd5410ecc659a2a7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m.