Triple
T13764205
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Habersham County |
E330693
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Banks County |
E354599
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Banks County | Statement: [Habersham County, borders, Banks County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Banks County Context triple: [Habersham County, borders, Banks County]
-
A.
Banks County
chosen
Banks County is a rural county in northeastern Georgia known for its location within the historic Georgia Gold Belt and its small-town communities.
-
B.
Tallapoosa County
Tallapoosa County is a county in east-central Alabama known for Lake Martin, outdoor recreation, and its county seat, Dadeville.
-
C.
Toombs County
Toombs County is a rural county in southeastern Georgia known for its agriculture, particularly Vidalia onions, and its county seat, Lyons.
-
D.
Gordon County
Gordon County is a county in northwestern Georgia, United States, known historically for its location within the mineral-rich Georgia Gold Belt.
-
E.
Schley County
Schley County is a rural county in west-central Georgia known for its small population, agricultural landscape, and the county seat of Ellaville.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d81c583b0081909e408a17db517a21 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69de022690ac8190bd5410ecc659a2a7 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 9 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7c6fe88348190aa9803f7d6d67023 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 10:10 p.m.