Triple
T13754
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pacific War |
E275
|
entity |
| Predicate | warfareType |
P1403
|
FINISHED |
| Object | naval warfare |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: naval warfare | Statement: [Pacific War, warfareType, naval warfare]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: warfareType Context triple: [Pacific War, warfareType, naval warfare]
-
A.
militaryConflict
Indicates a relationship where two or more parties are engaged in organized, armed hostilities or warfare against each other.
-
B.
conflictSide
Indicates that an entity participates as a distinct party or faction on one side of a conflict or dispute.
-
C.
hasMilitaryBranch
Indicates that an entity is associated with, served in, or is part of a specific branch of a military organization.
-
D.
isCommanderInChiefOf
Indicates that one entity holds the highest authority and ultimate command over the armed forces or military organization of another entity.
-
E.
flag
Indicates that one entity marks, signals, or draws attention to another entity, often to denote status, importance, or the need for review or action.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a243abb2ec8190937365e5ecec52ad |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe9470c8190918a6ca1df168646 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a243aa85848190813154e8a6495200 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.