Triple

T13730369
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dobromierz, Poland E329779 entity
Predicate hasNearbyCity P350 FINISHED
Object Świdnica NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Świdnica | Statement: [Dobromierz, Poland, hasNearbyCity, Świdnica]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Świdnica
Context triple: [Dobromierz, Poland, hasNearbyCity, Świdnica]
  • A. Świdnica chosen
    Świdnica is a historic town in southwestern Poland known for its well-preserved medieval architecture and the UNESCO-listed Church of Peace.
  • B. Świdnik
    Świdnik is a town in eastern Poland known for its aviation industry and proximity to the regional capital, Lublin.
  • C. Cieszyn
    Cieszyn is a historic town in southern Poland on the Olza River, known for its shared Polish-Czech heritage and well-preserved old town.
  • D. Tarnów
    Tarnów is a historic city in southern Poland known for its well-preserved Old Town, Renaissance architecture, and cultural heritage.
  • E. Ścinawa
    Ścinawa is a historic town in southwestern Poland, situated on the Oder River in the Lower Silesian region.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d80772315881908f980cae40d91664 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69de01f92b588190be97ec4564dddd59 completed April 14, 2026, 8:59 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:55 p.m.