Triple
T13717711
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heart of a Champion |
E328945
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainArtistStyle |
P33180
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southern hip hop style |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Southern hip hop style | Statement: [Heart of a Champion, mainArtistStyle, Southern hip hop style]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainArtistStyle Context triple: [Heart of a Champion, mainArtistStyle, Southern hip hop style]
-
A.
hasArtistGenre
Indicates that an artist is associated with or categorized under a particular musical or artistic genre.
-
B.
hasSongStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
-
C.
styleOfMusic
chosen
Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
-
D.
hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses or exhibits a particular musical style as a defining characteristic.
-
E.
hasMusicalStyleSimilarTo
Indicates that two entities share a comparable or closely related musical style or sound.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80770b9bc81909f70c8c317d53cff |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dd4398f0448190810c840a82228706 |
completed | April 13, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69dbbe92d77c81908e0244cffb7f78c5 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:54 p.m.