Triple

T13636298
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Requirements for Internet Hosts – Communication Layers E325856 entity
Predicate obsoletes P101 FINISHED
Object RFC 1022 E325857 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 1022 | Statement: [Requirements for Internet Hosts – Communication Layers, obsoletes, RFC 1022]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 1022
Context triple: [Requirements for Internet Hosts – Communication Layers, obsoletes, RFC 1022]
  • A. RFC 1022 chosen
    RFC 1022 is an early Internet standards document that was later superseded by RFC 1122, which more comprehensively defines host requirements for Internet protocols.
  • B. RFC 822
    RFC 822 is an early Internet standard that defines the format of text-based email messages, including headers and addressing conventions.
  • C. RFC 882
    RFC 882 was an early Internet standard that originally specified the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol before being superseded by later RFCs such as RFC 1035.
  • D. RFC 821
    RFC 821 is the original Internet standard that formally defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for electronic mail transmission.
  • E. RFC 2822
    RFC 2822 is an Internet standard that defines the format for text-based email messages, updating and replacing the earlier RFC 822 specification.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8076beddc8190a53156f5bea77f5e completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbc5a616dc81908b8c1213e1d4beed completed April 12, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f78af297008190b12256c936714213 completed May 3, 2026, 5:50 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:51 p.m.