Triple

T1362376
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DeBoer v. Snyder E29124 entity
Predicate citationSixthCircuit P4420 FINISHED
Object 772 F.3d 388 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 772 F.3d 388 | Statement: [DeBoer v. Snyder, citationSixthCircuit, 772 F.3d 388]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citationSixthCircuit
Context triple: [DeBoer v. Snyder, citationSixthCircuit, 772 F.3d 388]
  • A. circuitJustice
    Indicates that an individual serves as a justice or judge on a specific judicial circuit.
  • B. judicialCircuit
    Indicates the judicial circuit within which a legal entity, case, or jurisdiction is organized or falls under authority.
  • C. constitutionalCitation
    Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
  • D. formerLegalCitation
    Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
  • E. legalCitation chosen
    Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498d77abc8190913bf57e5f51d2c4 completed March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c2b4ab3c8190ad692e32eee05976 completed March 1, 2026, 10:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef945c08190a027472fdd695ea5 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:57 p.m.