Triple

T13609247
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miriam Midge Maisel E325142 entity
Predicate maritalStatusAtSeriesStart P20884 FINISHED
Object married LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: married | Statement: [Miriam Midge Maisel, maritalStatusAtSeriesStart, married]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maritalStatusAtSeriesStart
Context triple: [Miriam Midge Maisel, maritalStatusAtSeriesStart, married]
  • A. spouseStatusAtMarriage
    Indicates the marital status each partner held at the time their marriage to one another was formed.
  • B. marital status chosen
    Indicates the legal or social state of a person’s marriage-related relationship, such as being single, married, divorced, or widowed.
  • C. hasMaritalStatusAtEnd
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific marital status at the end of a given period, event, or reference time.
  • D. spouseStatus
    Indicates the marital relationship status between two individuals, such as whether they are currently spouses, formerly spouses, or not married to each other.
  • E. hasCivilStatus
    Indicates the civil or marital status that applies to a person or entity (e.g., single, married, divorced).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbbb9ee3f081909056dc1a92c40b7a completed April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbae1b3ee481909bd43ded6227a3e5 completed April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:50 p.m.