Triple

T13603979
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Il Duce E325011 entity
Predicate hasNegativeHistoricalAssociation P110376 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Il Duce, hasNegativeHistoricalAssociation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNegativeHistoricalAssociation
Context triple: [Il Duce, hasNegativeHistoricalAssociation, true]
  • A. hasHistoricalTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is historically connected or linked to another through past events, associations, or influences.
  • B. hasHistoryOf
    Indicates that an entity has a documented prior occurrence or background of a specified condition, event, or state.
  • C. hasNotableHistoricalAssociation
    Indicates that there is a significant connection between an entity and an important historical event, figure, period, or development.
  • D. hasHistoricalEntity
    Indicates a relationship where one entity includes, references, or is associated with another entity that existed or is defined in a past historical context.
  • E. hasHistoryIn
    Indicates that an entity has a past involvement, presence, or record of activity within a particular domain, context, or location.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d80769eaf081909d82f44e484d6113 completed April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbbb9ee3f081909056dc1a92c40b7a completed April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69dbae1b3ee481909bd43ded6227a3e5 completed April 12, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dbbb8c77dc8190b7bd803b5e168d23 completed April 12, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:50 p.m.