Triple
T1349216
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tanco v. Haslam |
E28842
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalClaim |
P6273
|
FINISHED |
| Object | violation of Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: violation of Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment | Statement: [Tanco v. Haslam, legalClaim, violation of Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalClaim Context triple: [Tanco v. Haslam, legalClaim, violation of Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment]
-
A.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
B.
typeOfClaim
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of a claim being made in relation to an entity or statement.
-
C.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
D.
legalDetail
Indicates that there is specific legal information, conditions, or attributes associated with the related entity or relationship.
-
E.
legalOrigin
Indicates the foundational legal system or jurisdiction from which an entity’s laws, regulations, or legal framework are derived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498571d248190a0ac9eb02d97097f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c268745481908be649526c18e558 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bef5857c81909ae984feb85a26ca |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.