Triple

T1345697
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Philip W. Crosby E28565 entity
Predicate notableWork P4 FINISHED
Object Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council E2548 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council | Statement: [Philip W. Crosby, notableWork, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council
Context triple: [Philip W. Crosby, notableWork, Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council]
  • A. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council chosen
    Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a Massachusetts law restricting state business with Burma was preempted by federal sanctions under the Supremacy Clause.
  • B. Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting
    Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld an Arizona law allowing the state to revoke business licenses of employers who knowingly hire unauthorized immigrants, ruling that it was not preempted by federal immigration law.
  • C. Frohwerk v. United States
    Frohwerk v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a conviction for antiwar newspaper articles, reinforcing broad federal power to punish speech deemed obstructive to World War I military recruitment.
  • D. United States v. Darby
    United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
  • E. United States v. Comstock
    United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49854eb3481908c7d56b2e449a290 completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c23e84188190b0395c57dd45b62a completed March 1, 2026, 10:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69acc6351cbc81909e2ffc692ee92b54 completed March 8, 2026, 12:43 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.