Triple

T1334005
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lord of Ahaus E28705 entity
Predicate hasFeudalRank P9679 FINISHED
Object lordship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lordship | Statement: [Lord of Ahaus, hasFeudalRank, lordship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFeudalRank
Context triple: [Lord of Ahaus, hasFeudalRank, lordship]
  • A. feudalStatus
    Indicates the hierarchical social or legal position an entity holds within a feudal system, such as lord, vassal, or serf.
  • B. isFeudal
    Indicates that one entity holds a feudal relationship to another, typically involving hierarchical obligations such as land tenure, service, or allegiance.
  • C. hasNotableDukedom
    Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a dukedom that is considered historically or culturally significant.
  • D. nobilityClass chosen
    Indicates that an entity belongs to, or is associated with, a particular class or rank within a nobility hierarchy.
  • E. associatedWithFeudalSystem
    Indicates a relationship in which something is connected, linked, or relevant to the structures, practices, or institutions of a feudal system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a498561a508190a3e1bc137c2b866a completed March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c1e98900819092c54c0fb58b958a completed March 1, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bef174708190a07bbc697fe19a2d completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:55 p.m.