Triple

T13295639
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fugue in F minor, BWV 857 E316672 entity
Predicate hasTempoIndicationInModernEditions P60128 FINISHED
Object often Andante or similar LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often Andante or similar | Statement: [Fugue in F minor, BWV 857, hasTempoIndicationInModernEditions, often Andante or similar]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTempoIndicationInModernEditions
Context triple: [Fugue in F minor, BWV 857, hasTempoIndicationInModernEditions, often Andante or similar]
  • A. hasTempoMarking chosen
    Indicates that a musical passage, piece, or event is associated with a specific tempo indication or marking.
  • B. hasTempoChanges
    Indicates that the tempo of the piece or segment changes over its duration, rather than remaining constant.
  • C. hasTempoVariety
    Indicates that an entity exhibits variation or changes in tempo rather than maintaining a constant speed.
  • D. hasTempoCategory
    Indicates that something is associated with a particular tempo classification or speed category.
  • E. hasTempoIndicationMovementMenuet
    Indicates that a musical movement has a tempo marking specifying it should be played in the style or tempo of a menuet.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b40ab4819094adf6c374f4811a completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d99cfdc9388190af1fdd3cd4717bd8 completed April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98f6893708190aeebf4c47386cff7 completed April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:28 p.m.