Triple
T1328350
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | El Súper Clásico |
E28381
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableTeamColor |
P4834
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yellow and blue (Club América) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yellow and blue (Club América) | Statement: [El Súper Clásico, notableTeamColor, yellow and blue (Club América)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableTeamColor Context triple: [El Súper Clásico, notableTeamColor, yellow and blue (Club América)]
-
A.
teamColor
chosen
Indicates the association between a team and the color that represents or identifies it.
-
B.
notableTeamNickname
Indicates that a team is commonly known by a particular nickname that is notable or widely recognized.
-
C.
leaderJerseyColor
Indicates the color of the jersey worn by the current leader in a competition or ranking.
-
D.
notablePlayerTeam1
Indicates that the referenced player is a notable or prominent member of the first team in a given context or matchup.
-
E.
usesNHLClubColorsOf
Indicates that one entity adopts and applies the official color scheme associated with a specified NHL club.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498540a2481909e807a762280d3ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c1c1d8188190b15a641a08345adc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4beef6a188190996f8775bdda8f6c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:55 p.m.