Triple
T13239240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Count of Trastámara |
E315235
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfFeudalUnit |
P78310
|
FINISHED |
| Object | county |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: county | Statement: [Count of Trastámara, typeOfFeudalUnit, county]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfFeudalUnit Context triple: [Count of Trastámara, typeOfFeudalUnit, county]
-
A.
feudalSystemUnit
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity functions as a unit or component within a broader feudal system structure.
-
B.
feudalType
Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal relationship, structure, or tenure that applies between the related entities.
-
C.
feudalStatus
Indicates the hierarchical social or legal position an entity holds within a feudal system, such as lord, vassal, or serf.
-
D.
typeOfFeudalGrant
Indicates the specific kind or category of feudal grant that characterizes the relationship between a grantor and a grantee within a feudal system.
-
E.
feudalFunction
Indicates the role or duty an entity holds within a feudal hierarchy, such as obligations, services, or functions owed to or performed for another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b1072881909e46bd212259c5f0 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98d5850ac8190849a51da39efe5be |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bcb21648190aef241de1e7887e2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:23 p.m.