Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Marbury v. Madison | Statement: [Judiciary Act of 1789, partlyInvalidatedByCase, Marbury v. Madison]

Target entity: Marbury v. Madison
Context triple: [Judiciary Act of 1789, partlyInvalidatedByCase, Marbury v. Madison]

• A. Marbury v. Madison chosen
  Marbury v. Madison is the landmark 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.
• B. Gibbons v. Ogden
  Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
• C. McCulloch v. Maryland
  McCulloch v. Maryland is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over the states and upheld the implied powers of Congress under the Constitution.
• D. Bolling v. Sharpe
  Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
• E. Judiciary Act of 1789
  The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a foundational U.S. federal statute that organized the national court system, defined the structure and jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, and established key judicial procedures under the new Constitution.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: partlyInvalidatedByCase
Context triple: [Judiciary Act of 1789, partlyInvalidatedByCase, Marbury v. Madison]

• A. relatedCase
  Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
• B. partlyDefinedBy
  Indicates that one entity’s nature, role, or characteristics are only partially determined or specified by another entity.
• C. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• D. interpretedInCase chosen
  Indicates that something is understood, analyzed, or given meaning within the context of a particular case or specific situational scenario.
• E. doesNotFullyExplain
  Indicates that one entity’s explanation of another entity, event, or situation is incomplete or insufficient to account for it fully.
• F. None of above.