Triple
T130934
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Letter from Birmingham Jail |
E2651
|
entity |
| Predicate | defends |
P6876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | direct action |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: direct action | Statement: [Letter from Birmingham Jail, defends, direct action]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defends Context triple: [Letter from Birmingham Jail, defends, direct action]
-
A.
defender
Indicates a relationship where one entity protects, guards, or supports another entity against threats, attacks, or criticism.
-
B.
protects
Indicates taking action to keep someone or something safe from harm, danger, or negative effects.
-
C.
typeOfDefense
Indicates the specific kind or category of defense employed or possessed in a given context.
-
D.
defendant
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
E.
protectedBy
Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2520c0f3481908b0ed054a2fca8d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25855baf48190a1b63f2e5865d957 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564edb488190974dc00eb9ac37d9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2585408c881908a25b5c61f300154 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:30 a.m.