Triple
T13039845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maria Weston Chapman |
E327162
|
entity |
| Predicate | wrote |
P2831
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Right and Wrong in Massachusetts
Right and Wrong in Massachusetts is an 1839 abolitionist pamphlet that critiques the moral and political compromises of Massachusetts institutions regarding slavery.
|
E1017192
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Right and Wrong in Massachusetts | Statement: [Maria Weston Chapman, wrote, Right and Wrong in Massachusetts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Right and Wrong in Massachusetts Context triple: [Maria Weston Chapman, wrote, Right and Wrong in Massachusetts]
-
A.
Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
-
B.
Prince v. Massachusetts
Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
-
C.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
-
D.
Massachusetts Equal Rights Act
The Massachusetts Equal Rights Act is a state civil rights statute that guarantees equal protection and prohibits discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and public accommodations within Massachusetts.
-
E.
Massachusetts law
Massachusetts law is the body of state statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions that governs legal rights and obligations within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Right and Wrong in Massachusetts Triple: [Maria Weston Chapman, wrote, Right and Wrong in Massachusetts]
Generated description
Right and Wrong in Massachusetts is an 1839 abolitionist pamphlet that critiques the moral and political compromises of Massachusetts institutions regarding slavery.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Right and Wrong in Massachusetts Target entity description: Right and Wrong in Massachusetts is an 1839 abolitionist pamphlet that critiques the moral and political compromises of Massachusetts institutions regarding slavery.
-
A.
Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
-
B.
Prince v. Massachusetts
Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
-
C.
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
-
D.
Massachusetts Equal Rights Act
The Massachusetts Equal Rights Act is a state civil rights statute that guarantees equal protection and prohibits discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and public accommodations within Massachusetts.
-
E.
Massachusetts law
Massachusetts law is the body of state statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions that governs legal rights and obligations within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076e64308190904fb5c93517c901 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9804d8e3081909584c93df099859a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6cbd2f6a481909fdd418e7ad3cc22 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:15 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f6cd0d21e08190855dcbee000fc25d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:20 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69f6ce6b220c8190b1f49a9b2bfce692 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:26 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:55 p.m.