Triple
T13029028
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Results and Prospects |
E326382
|
entity |
| Predicate | formulatesTheory |
P47923
|
FINISHED |
| Object | theory of permanent revolution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: theory of permanent revolution | Statement: [Results and Prospects, formulatesTheory, theory of permanent revolution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formulatesTheory Context triple: [Results and Prospects, formulatesTheory, theory of permanent revolution]
-
A.
developsTheory
chosen
Indicates that one entity formulates, elaborates, or advances a theoretical framework or explanation concerning another entity.
-
B.
presentsTheory
Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or explains a theory to another entity or audience.
-
C.
theorized
Indicates that one entity has proposed or developed a theoretical explanation or hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
-
D.
hasTheory
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
-
E.
proposesHypothesis
Indicates that one entity puts forward a tentative explanation or hypothesis for consideration regarding another entity or phenomenon.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076cc45c81908123123f43e69266 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97efd18308190877b3269403b36e2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dc39a0881908119c62e31bf6182 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:54 p.m.