Triple
T13026338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Como, Illinois |
E326316
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasName |
P744
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Como, Illinois |
E326316
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Como, Illinois | Statement: [Como, Illinois, hasName, Como, Illinois]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Como, Illinois Context triple: [Como, Illinois, hasName, Como, Illinois]
-
A.
Como, Illinois
chosen
Como, Illinois is a small unincorporated community in Whiteside County that forms part of the Sterling Micropolitan Statistical Area.
-
B.
De Land, Illinois
De Land, Illinois is a small rural village located in central Illinois within Piatt County.
-
C.
Illinois
Illinois is a Midwestern U.S. state known for its major metropolis Chicago, diverse economy, and significant political and transportation influence.
-
D.
Washington, Illinois
Washington, Illinois is a small city in Tazewell County known as a residential community within the Peoria metropolitan area in central Illinois.
-
E.
La Fox, Illinois
La Fox, Illinois is an unincorporated community in Kane County, Illinois, known primarily for its commuter rail station providing access to the Chicago metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8076cc45c81908123123f43e69266 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97efac71881908a21d70c3c6ce099 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6cbcb86148190ad1b19c6e8764397 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:53 p.m.