Triple
T12969774
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pirkanmaa |
E321361
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pälkäne |
E846954
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pälkäne | Statement: [Pirkanmaa, hasCity, Pälkäne]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pälkäne Context triple: [Pirkanmaa, hasCity, Pälkäne]
-
A.
Pälkäne
chosen
Pälkäne is a municipality in southern Finland known for its lakeside landscapes and rural character.
-
B.
Pelinna
Pelinna was an ancient city in Thessaly, Greece, notable as an archaeological site where Orphic gold tablets associated with mystery cult funerary practices were discovered.
-
C.
Lapua
Lapua is a small town in western Finland known for its historical significance, including a former state cartridge factory and its role in the Lapua Movement.
-
D.
Pöytyä
Pöytyä is a rural municipality in southwestern Finland known for its forests, agriculture, and small village communities.
-
E.
Pietilä
Pietilä is a Finnish surname borne by various notable individuals in fields such as art, architecture, and public life.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80763bd6c819094437da5b20b01d2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e407e5081909424fc0c22483c28 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7396b901c81908bfac5b40e3caed4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:34 p.m.